Where does it not display, in what software, and where in the software? On the website? CIW RMS station operators can have MARS access to the web site, where full information is displayed. Are you logged in and have you been given MARS access rights? Need you to be specific or you won't get the help you want.

Quite right. But it could be much better. Enforcing good amateur practice in precious US wideband segments could be implemented by a switch that identifies the client as a US station that disallows control of bandwidth by the client. There are many clever ways to do that, even transparently; i.e. by gridsquare, or .ini file setting.

In affected countries lawful operation is practical with the present design only if there are many RMS stations that offer narrowband connections to which an affected client can connect. This is not so and unlikely in places like Europe, where there are not large political areas governed by the same rules. Having many more on-air RMS stations, ironically in itself, is also abusive to band usage, and unnecessary given the nature of HF propagation.

The most unfortunate thing about the present design is that it makes UNINTENTIONAL rule breaking very likely by an operator, who, despite his responsibility will naturally assume WINMOR works like the more familiar Pactor modes. It is UNNATURAL design to keep the control of an operator's transmitter from him and investing it in another station in a country with different rules. Unnatural design fosters wrong assumptions. This is a basic principle of good user interface design! You can rightfully argue the responsibility to connect lawfully rests on the client, but it is disingenuous to argue it prevents abuse in one place while allowing it, or even encouraging it elsewhere. Moreover:

Fact: Narrowband protocol transmissions in wideband segments in the US is NOT illegal, just ungentlemanly and not good amateur practice.

Fact: Unintentionally connecting to a wideband RMS from affected countries IS illegal.

The current design offers hard enforcement of good amateur practice in the US while simultaneously offers an operator in an affected country no protection from an infraction of law. There is no balance in the design, and arguments to the contrary are insensitive and US-centric. Winlink is a GLOBAL system.

Granting control to the client prevents unintentional infractions, and it can be done in a way to enforce good amateur usage of crowded US wideband segments.

WINMOR is planned for Paclink.

Why add AGW support to RMS Express? Please explain. It supports almost all known TNCs directly or via KISS without AGWPE or PE Pro. Many feel AGW middleware only complicates any station and especially makes EmComm stations unreliable.

This is not too helpful. There is no way ALL features will be included because the software has a more limited purpose. (Airmail supports not only Winlink, but Sailmail and other systems.) However, a specific list of desired features and their descriptions is something we can work with.

This should come with standard templates for position reports, options messages, and position requests. ICS-213 forms, too. Ideally, these templates will be fillable forms.