Have Paclink and RMSExpress share all same protocols

WINMOR is planned for Paclink.

Why add AGW support to RMS Express? Please explain. It supports almost all known TNCs directly or via KISS without AGWPE or PE Pro. Many feel AGW middleware only complicates any station and especially makes EmComm stations unreliable.

Simply because I can operate all non-pactor digital modes with a sound card, using one end user program or another, and I don't want to tie up another computer port, save/maintain another configuration, and spend money (little/much is relative) on something only required by some software, but not all.
FWIW, I've never had any trouble with AGW, albeit I do use Packet Engine Pro which has a somewhat more capable interface than the free version.

The KAM option for PACTOR in RMS Express in addition to SCS and PK232 would be nice down the wish line.
73. LA7UM Finn

I see Express VHF as the entry-level, single user or EmComm remote program.  I feel that it should be as much KISS as possible.  I see Paclink as the Hub or relay software for 24/7/365 operators.